ATI Rage 128 Pro 4XL (Nederlands) Free Driver Download for Windows 2003, XP, 2000, NT4, NT3.51, ME, 98SE, 98, 95, 3.1 - 46942x6vidnt4.zip (132966). World's most popular driver download site. ATI Rage 128 Pro 4XL Free Driver Download for Windows 2003, XP, 2000, NT4, NT3.51, ME, 98SE, 98, 95, 3.1. World's most popular driver download site. Description: ATI RAGE 128Rage 128 Pro Products include:Rage FuryRage MagnumXpert 2000Xpert 128Xpert 99All-In-Wonder 128 FuryRage Fury ProXpert 2000 ProAll-In-Wonder 128 Pro for Windows NT (Special Purpose Drivers Version 6.35CD21-4.3.143) Download Rage 128 / PRO ATI Rage 128 / Rage 128 Pro Driver Files v.6.35CD21 - 4.3.143. ATI Rage 128 PRO Free Driver Download for Windows NT4, ME, 98SE, 98, 95. World's most popular driver download site. Ati rage 128 pro driver windows nt.
Unfortunately for any megalomaniacs with planet-destroying aspirations, building the Death Star is financially impossible — on Earth at least. The Empire and First Order in the Star Wars universe must have resources we don’t, because the party-planning mathematicians at Twizzle crunched the numbers, and the total cost of the Empire’s deadliest superweapon would bankrupt Earth many, many times over.
Simply put, the Death Star isn’t a good investment. In all, the total cost of building a moon-sized superweapon would be $22,452,000,000,000,000,000. And that’s just the complete framework of the thing. That amount doesn’t even include weapons to make planets go boom, tractor beams to pull in strange ships that blasted their way out of Mos Eisley, or communications equipment to get to the bottom of who brought a Wookiee to the detention level.
The extra costs take into consideration the size of the deadly space station itself, how much would be needed for construction materials like a whole lot of steel, and dont forget the cost of sending all those materials out into space above a planet, like, say, Scarif. The steel costs alone would apparently equal something like thirteen-times the entire GDP of all the countries on Earth.
Needless to say, a Death Star would be expensive. Granted, the Empire probably offsets some of those costs by using the Star Wars universe’s advanced technology, but it’s still a ludicrous amount of resources.
So remember, when Jyn Erso and her band of Rebels steal the plans to the Death Star in Rogue One, they cost the Empire over $22 quintillion in cash. No word on the conversion rates of USD to Imperial credits, let along the Wupiupi or the druggat.
If you've ever wondered about the economics of Star Wars, you'll be pleased to hear the maths has already been done.
First up, students in the US with a lot of time on their hands worked out the cost of building the Death Star megastructure.
They calculated it would set you back $852,000,000,000,000,000 (£564 quadrillion). To put that into context - it's roughly 13,000 times Earth's GDP (the total value of everything we make in a year).
Cost To Build Death Star Tiles
Now an expert in electrical and systems engineering has estimated the catastrophic economic impact of the Death Star being destroyed, twice. We'll come back to him.
Image caption Fancy these slightly cheaper mini action figurines instead?
So why is it so expensive to build?
'Building a massive space weapon is all very well, but you have to find the materials to build it with,' said the students at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania.
More related stories
They reckoned producing the steel would take 833,315 years.
'Scaling up to the Death Star, this is about 1.08 x 1,000,000,000,000,000 tonnes of steel,' they said. That's an awful lot of steel.
But it's pretty good value when you consider that from the Earth's iron, you could make just over two billion Death Stars.
Economic depression of astronomical proportions..
Washington University in St Louis
Remember though, the Death Star's been destroyed twice already in Star Wars films.
Destroyed twice, you say?
Yes, in the first film, A New Hope, and then again in Return of the Jedi, the rebuilt second Death Star is also blown to pieces.
And here's the truly dark side of all these calculations.
Zachary Feinstein, from Washington University in St Louis, explains that he first 'modelled the state of the economy of the Galactic Empire'.
He then worked out the economic repercussions from the Battle of Endor, when the second Death Star met its end.
Image caption Can't afford a galactic super weapon with room for 400,000 droids? Maybe go for this instead?
He reckoned the Rebel Alliance (the good guys) would have needed a mega bailout to prevent 'catastrophic' economic collapse across the galaxy. Bethesda skyrim se mods pc.
'Without such funds at the ready, it's likely the Galactic economy would enter an economic depression of astronomical proportions,' he wrote.
'With the disintegration of the Galactic government,' he worked out that the losses 'would measure $515.5 quintillion (£341 quintillion)'.
We told you your head would hurt. Sawal hi jawab hai pdf free download.
And the next film in the anthology, Rogue One, due out in December 2016, will focus on rebels stealing the plans for the original Death Star..
For more stories like this one you can now download the BBC Newsbeat app straight to your device. For iPhone go here. For Android go here.
Building the Death Star from Star Wars is a highly questionable choice on multiple levels; it’s a giant weapons platform designed to commit war crimes that also violates the laws of physics. And, it turns out, not securing the thing properly would deliver a more decisive blow than any strike team from Yavin ever could.
Zachary Feinstein, a financial engineering professor at St. Louis’ Washington University, used some rough estimates to figure out the price tag of the Death Star. The cost? $193 quintillion in 2012 dollars. Yes, as in 10 to the 18th power. To give you an idea of how much that is, this means the GDP of the Empire has to be $4.6 sextillion a year just to make building this white elephant a reasonable proposition. Just for a measure of scale here, in 2013, the Earth’s total GDP was $75.6 trillion.
It gets better, though: Using what we know of how the galactic economy works, Feinstein points out that due to nationalization, the banking sector would have been heavily invested in the construction and possible profit from the Death Star. So, after the events of the original trilogy, between depreciation and costs, the Empire would have to eat a $515 quintillion turd sandwich. And this is the best possible scenario, assuming the Emperor had kept other debt under control, that the first Death Star was half paid for, and that Emperor Palpatine could borrow at a 0% interest rate. That last one we find credible because, come on, he’s a tyrant, but everything else? Nah. Why wouldn’t Palpatine borrow like crazy? Who’s going to collect?
So, essentially, after Return of the Jedi, there was a massive, galaxy-wide economic collapse, which would explain why the Empire fragmented and why the rebellion had trouble taking over. It also explains why the First Order is hollowing out a planet for its giant boondoggle of a weapons platform; even an excavation of that scale has to be cheaper.
(Via Pop Sci)
Now Watch: Are Star Wars Fans The Craziest Fans?
Is seems that while you should never underestimate the power of the Dark Side, you should also pay attention to the depth of their pockets.
Economics students at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania have calculated that it would require one quadrillion tons of steel to build a Death Star like those that featured in the movies.
It would cost 13,000 times the world's gross domestic product (GDP), or £541,261 trillion, to supply the steel for such a structure while labour and other construction costs would send the price even higher.
They also worked out it would take more than 833,315 years at current production levels to supply enough steel for the 87 mile diameter space craft.
In a tongue-in-cheek report on the Centives blog run by the Lehigh University economics students, they said: 'We decided to model the Death Star as having a similar density in steel as a modern warship.
'After all, they're both essentially floating weapons platforms so that seems reasonable.
'Building a massive space weapon is all very well, but you have to find the materials to build it with.'
The students also calculated that with all the iron in the earth, it would be possible to build just over 2 billion death stars.
They warned, however, that most of the iron is in the core of the planet.
They said: 'Before you go off to start building your apocalyptic weapon, do bear in mind two things.
'Firstly, the two billion death stars is mostly from the Earth's core, which we would all really rather you didn't remove.
'Secondly, at today's rate of steel production (1.3 billion tonnes annually), it would take 833,315 years to produce enough steel to begin work.
'So once someone notices what you're up to, you have to fend them off for 800 millennia before you have a chance to fight back.'
Let’s say you’re an evil Imperial overlord in the
Even if you can imagine quite a bit, Centives, the economics blog of students of Lehigh University, says it would cost “$852,000,000,000,000,000. Or roughly 13,000 times the world's GDP” to build the Death Star…and that’s just the cost of steel production.
It turns out that it would take more than money to build a fully operational battle station. It would take cold, hard steel, made from hot molten iron. Although the Earth’s crust doesn’t have enough, the Earth’s core, on the other hand, has iron aplenty. In fact, Earth has enough iron at its core to produce 2 billion Death Stars—a veritable Death Galaxy.
But let you think it’s a simple task of Force-Lifting the molten liquid and molding it into shape, consider this:
Firstly, the two billion death stars is mostly from the Earth's core which we would all really rather you didn't remove. And secondly, at today's rate of steel production (1.3 billion tonnes annually), it would take 833,315 years to produce enough steel to begin work. So once someone notices what you're up to, you have to fend them off for 800 millennia before you have a chance to fight back.
So instead of constructing a technological terror or two, it might be better to try actual diplomacy. If nothing else, it's absolutely more cost effective.
Via The Mary Sue.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |